Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Lawsuit
About?
Certain
plaintiffs allege that El Paso gave its unregulated merchant energy
subsidiary a secret discount enabling it to become the sole
successful bidder for 1.2 billion cubic feet of capacity on El
Paso's pipeline to California from March 2000 through May 2001, and
that El Paso and its subsidiary worked together to create artificial
shortages and artificially high natural gas prices during this time
period. This lawsuit also alleges that El Paso manipulated natural
gas price indices by engaging in "wash trades" and by giving false
information to the trade press. Other plaintiffs allege that in
1996, El Paso conspired with Southern California Gas Co. and San
Diego Gas & Electric (the "Sempra Defendants") to eliminate
competing pipeline projects under development which would have
increased supplies of natural gas to Southern California and reduced
or averted natural gas shortages and high natural gas and
electricity prices experienced in 2000 and 2001. El Paso and the
Sempra Defendants deny these allegations.
Who is Covered by the Settlement?
The
settlement class includes all individuals and businesses in
California who purchased natural gas and/or electricity for their
own use and not for resale or generation of electricity at any time
from September 1996 through March 20, 2003. If you or your business
paid a gas or electric bill to a California utility (a "ratepayer"),
were a "non-core" gas customer of a California gas utility
(generally large industrial users), or a "direct access" electricity
customer of a California utility during this time period, you and/or
your business are members of the settlement class. For more
information, including a detailed Notice of Proposed Class Action
Settlement, visit www.elpasosettlement.com or call
1-877-205-2720.
What Are the Terms of the Settlement?
In
exchange for the release of all claims arising out of alleged
misconduct relating to the California energy crisis, El Paso will
provide total consideration to the class of approximately $1.4
billion, as follows:
- Up-front cash payments totaling approximately $256
million.
- Proceeds of the sale of 26,371,308 shares of El Paso
Corporation common stock, having a market value of approximately
$207 million as of July 24, 2003.
- $125 million in price reductions on power contracts with
the California Department of Water Resources through 2005, the
cost of which would otherwise be passed on to class
members.
- Approximately $798 million, paid in equal semi-annual
installments over 20 years, accelerated to 15 years if El Paso
obtains an investment-grade rating for 6 months, secured by oil
and gas properties and subject to a prepayment option by El Paso
at a discount rate of either 7.48% or 7.86%.
- Extensive structural relief designed to help prevent a
recurrence of natural gas supply shortages and high prices in
California.
- Cooperation with plaintiffs in ongoing litigation against
other defendants.
- Costs of class notice and settlement
administration.
The benefits of the settlement will be passed through to
California gas and electricity ratepayers and direct access
electricity customers in the form of rate reductions, credits,
and/or rebates, subject to the approval of the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC). If the settlement is approved,
"non-core" gas customers will be invited to submit claims for their
share of the settlement, based on a formula. The several groups of
class members will share the benefits of the settlement in
approximately the following percentages: electricity ratepayers and
direct access electricity customers - 73%; natural gas ratepayers -
12%; non-core gas customers - 15%. As nearly all natural gas users
are also electricity users, they will also benefit from electricity
rate reductions, and vice-versa. PG&E reserves the right to
contend before the CPUC that because it was unable to recover the
full cost of its electricity purchases while a rate freeze was in
effect, it is entitled to certain amounts otherwise allocated to
electricity ratepayers in its service territory. The settlement is
also subject to FERC approval and entry of a stipulated judgment
incorporating the structural relief.
What Are My Rights?
. If you
wish to remain in the settlement class, you need not take any action
at this time. However, you will be bound by the rulings of the Court
if the settlement is approved. This will include a release of your
claims against El Paso. The settlement will not release class
members' claims against the Sempra Defendants or other firms who are
defendants in related litigation arising out of California's energy
crisis.
- If you do not wish to participate in the settlement or be
bound by the Settlement terms, you must exclude yourself in
writing postmarked no later than October 14, 2003, as outlined in
the Exclusion
Procedures page.
- A hearing will be held by the Court on November 20, 2003
to determine whether the proposed settlement should be approved
and to consider the application of the eleven law firms
representing the class for attorneys' fees and costs not to exceed
$60 million.
If you wish to object to the settlement, you must remain a
class member. You and/or your counsel may appear in opposition to
the settlement following procedures outlined in the Notice of
Proposed Class Action Settlement.